A Short Writing About Public Transport

I’ve complained about public transport quite a lot and I refuse to stop being as vocal as I can about its mediocrity, yet I still use it a fair bit because I think that public transport should be supported in any way possible.

There’s certainly something that can be said for not using Sydney’s public transport until it improves. I think that it is a good way to show that it’s not working because using alternatives that work better generally make people turn around and re-think how something should operate.

It is unfortunate that that isn’t always an option for others, so the next best way (in my opinion) is to keep using it and be as vocal as possible about what is wrong with how it is operating, as well as not having much of a choice in other forms of transport.

Public transport is a really good idea and allowing it to accommodate as many people as possible at as cheap a rate as possible is generally great incentive for more people taking advantage of what it offers.

To be quite frank, for what you get, Sydney’s public transport is overpriced. Services have improved quite a lot over the last ten years (with some areas having no shortage of options and little to no worry about missing something and having to wait for a while), but they are still nowhere near as good as they’re made out to be, with delays still being overly common, buses that are a part of the timetable never showing up because it’s the weekend or the middle of the day and services not being frequent enough in areas where they’re needed, among many other problems.

On top of this, removing things such as the free trips with Opal (the electronic ticket system for Sydney), a major incentive for many for using Sydney’s public transport and replacing it with an inferior reduced price option (originally it was that after eight trips you would ride for free for the rest of the week and now it is that after eight trips you pay half price for the remainder [Sundays are capped at $2.50 for the whole day and this still applies]), with the possibility of the decision partly driven by the loss of money that was incurred due to free trips, which shouldn’t actually be something taken into consideration if more people are using the transportation available due to the incentive offered.

Perhaps if a loss in the millions is a problem that you have, then perhaps you should look at if you’re recklessly spending money instead of putting the costs back on the commuter because it seems as though the “loss” wasn’t really affecting the development and improvement of the public transport.

If many people are using the services provided, that’s good. It’s good because it gives an idea of how to develop the transportation system. With that being said, if there aren’t enough people are being vocal about what is wrong with the services, then improvements will be slower than they should.


About stupidityhole

I'm some guy that does stuff. The standards. Creating amazing effigies, scaling mountains using my feet only and replacing the very fabric of reality. Serious time! I enjoy writing. I make music in some of my spare time. Currently working somewhat full time and studying as well. Also working on self-improvement. Hoping to one day fill the internet with enough insane ramblings to impress a cannibal rat ship. I have a page called MS Paint Masterpieces that you may be interested in checking out.
This entry was posted in Life and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.